There are times when I get all inward. Yesterday was one of those times. Of course, being quiet and somewhat melancholy in a home can be difficult for a family, even as it is, all on its own, uncomfortable for the person who is feeling inward. And yet, inwardness does not seem, to me at least, to be a state of being that ought to kindle guilty feelings and stoke excessive apologies. Perhaps with this exception: you got to eventually get over it.
Last night reading helped me get over it. Well, the nap probably helped, too, as well as some quality time with my wife. Mostly it was the reading, though.
The trouble with reading is all that it can do to you. I’m not sure I’ve just said that right, “do to you.” It’s more like reading does things with me. Reading is not a one way relationship.
What is more, reading is not always a predictable relationship. Yesterday I read several essays, and passages from some other books, almost none of which was cheerful or uplifting. I am not saying that any of it was downcast or tragic. It just was not... Well, for instance: last night we considered renting on iTunes a Steve Martin movie, but eventually did not. None of the stuff that I read instead approached the humor of a Steve Martin movie. This is one reason that reading is so sneaky and satisfying. Give me, in a melancholy mood, a heady and even somewhat depressing literary essay, and surprise, it’s possible to put down the book in an affectionate mood.
In that reading mimics life and creates more dysfunction in the lives of those messed up readers who seek only understanding or pleasure. What we know, we know in part. And what pleasures we experience, we experience only in part. All that we read, we only read in part. Since our knowledge and our pleasures and our reading are always only partial, there’s opportunity for the unexpected. There is something healthy and satisfying in that.



Recent Comments